Haryana Land Deal Row: Big Claims, Bigger Questions Around Khattar’s Ex-Aide
Politics in Haryana has taken a dramatic turn after fresh allegations surfaced around a high-value land deal linked to a former aide of Chief Minister Manohar Lal Khattar. What looks like a routine property transaction on paper is now being painted as a possible case of insider advantage, and the numbers are raising eyebrows.
The Deal That Sparked the Controversy
According to claims made by the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), the sequence of events unfolded quickly:
- In February 2022, a company named A.N.A Real Logistics was set up by two individuals who purchased around 9 acres of land in Jhajjar for ₹2.73 crore from a Reliance-linked entity.
- By April, the company applied for a Change of Land Use (CLU), aiming to develop a warehouse on the site.
- In May, the CLU approval reportedly came through unusually fast—within about two weeks, which critics say is rare for such processes.
The Twist That Raised Eyebrows
Just before the CLU approval came in, ownership of the company—and effectively the land—was transferred to the wife and son of Neeraj Daftuar, who at the time served as Principal OSD to the Chief Minister.
What’s drawing attention is the reported transaction value: ₹75 lakh.
Opposition leaders argue this is far below what they claim to be the land’s actual worth, with estimates going up to ₹45 crore.
AAP leader Anurag Dhanda has alleged that the company may have been a front from the beginning, suggesting the deal could involve hidden financial arrangements.
The Company’s Response
A.N.A Real Logistics has rejected the allegations, offering a different version of events:
- They say the total payment made by the Daftuar family was ₹3.67 crore, including land cost and associated charges.
- They argue the purchase price was above the official circle rate, not below it.
- They also dispute the timeline, stating that CLU approval took closer to four months rather than just 12 working days.
Why This Matters
At the center of the controversy is the question of conflict of interest. Since Daftuar held a key government position during the timeline of the deal, critics argue there could have been undue influence in securing approvals.
AAP has called for a broader investigation, demanding a probe into similar land-use approvals granted during his tenure.
The Bigger Picture
For now, these remain allegations and counterclaims. But politically, the issue has already intensified debate around transparency, governance, and the use of power in land-related decisions—an area that has long been sensitive in Haryana’s political landscape.
News Source : Information for this article was gathered from a variety of reliable news outlets.
